Andrew Arnott
Andrew Arnott
Thank you for your report, investigation and repro! What an awesome bug report.
@matteo-prosperi I wonder if you could take a first look at this?
This bug is blocking my ability to use live unit testing where async methods are executed.
Well it's certainly easy enough to repro within Visual Studio with Live Unit Testing actually running. If you need a command line equivalent for it I wouldn't know how to...
I can't see a serialization use case for this. I don't suppose anyone would serialize a `ref struct` as it can't be part of a data model.
I'm starting work on this.
Let me know if you want a PR with the content of https://github.com/AArnott/Nerdbank.MessagePack/blob/f4f1e6f8dff53f167adea321cdbc0c18a1b923a6/src/Nerdbank.MessagePack/Converters/PropertyAssignmentTrackingManager%601.cs (see https://github.com/AArnott/Nerdbank.MessagePack/pull/373) for a whole example of how to use it.
With #176, this can potentially be done post-1.0, given we gain the ability to add features without binary breaking changes, assuming we're OK with `null` coming back from this method...
I recently enhanced my library's ability to ignore properties here: https://github.com/AArnott/Nerdbank.MessagePack/pull/239 It'll be interesting to harmonize with the new feature that you're talking about.
> we had to create bindings into Sentry's Android and iOS SDKs, to properly instrument the native code that gets produced when deploying to these platforms @jamescrosswell Does that mean...