7c6f434c
7c6f434c
>- "To have review at least 20 non-trivial PR's" – as a non-committer to a free software project, it's often not clear to me whether reviews from non-committers are welcome....
>It seems strange that `trusted-user` is required, even though in most(?) cases you would be able to directly `ssh` to the remote machine and run `nix-build`, which works without being...
I think MinGW/MSYS2 bash per se can be considered native.
A command-line parameter to pass arguments when importing a flake wouldn't break the command-level purity and would be rather similar to one of the purer ways of achieving it with...
My attempt to define «duplicate» from the previous discussion: « I am not sure about feasibility with the current API, but I would fetch the master commits from 1th December...
> mainstream software or high profile software That sounds in favour of pretty open (or quite multifaceted) category system.
OK, let's try to do something about it… @amjoseph-nixpkgs would you accept nomination?
@AndersonTorres BTW, will you be interested in keeping the draft always up-to-discussed-changes (i.e. whenever a remark is discussed and accepted, the decision gets into the draft of the RFC text...
Hmm. I self-nominate as a shepherd. My current stance: generally in favour, open-ish multi-faceted categorisation, slow-ish take-off in terms of actually marking packages with categories. Procedural stance: skewed towards semi-synchronous...
Also @davidak would you be willing to be a shepherd here?