Cassandra McCarthy

I'm just curious, why did this require 1.61?

Looks like this has now been addressed, but we should figure out what is left to do here.

I don't like the possibility of one request function call possibly sending more than one http request. And as Vivian said, the data is there for someone to implement this...

At least the first one is closed by #1809, but are the others?

Thank you for the detailed issue!

I can't seem to figure out how to deny the `vec` macro, when putting `disallowed-methods = ["vec"]` or `vec!` or `vec![]` or `std::vec`. Unfortunate

I'm not sure that I'm a fan of this impulse to remove as much "self-evident" information as possible. We should not assume that users who are reading crate-level documentation for...

Closing because this isn't a desired or necessary change at the moment.

This issue is technically addressed by #1809, and thus is closed by it.

The source PR has been merged.