52North
Funciton of [ ] for a PixelIterator with a Box
The function of the '[ ]' operator for a Pixel Iterator with a custom box isn't really clear and thus not really working. We need a decision on wether the indexes should be in relation to the whole raster or if the first pixel of the box has the index 0 (which would probably be most intuitive), no matter where in the raster the box is located.
probably correct. The pixeliterator works fine in respect to the boxes and ++ operator and such ( the main use). Some other methods have been implemented due to compatibility with similar interfaces in other c++ containers. But I question that decision now, The '[]' operator is questionable. I dont believe that people have a clear idea what the 334312 'ed pixel in a map is. If the 334312 pixel is the result of an iteration ( e.g. using the for(int i=0; ...; ++i) construct) that I would advice using the ++ operator which is much faster. Also due to the semantics of the origin location of this operations it is clear that the meaning of this operation isa bit questionable.
