4censord
4censord
A buddy of mine might also take a look at this, but until they actually do, feel free to do it yourself. I did some digging/designing: Basic overview and code...
i would not count on it any more. They had the time at the time, but now its exam time, so its unlikely they will have the time.
I have not worked with this before. First thing i noticed: > Due to confusion around the name, this service is being deprecated, and will eventually be shut down. Please...
My thoughts on this are limited. I don't have enough experience with either to recommend a further path. I can work with either, but have chosen to avoid working with...
We probably should also respect `robots.txt`
Unless this was implemented in the meantime, IMHO this is still a valid feature request. Especially because there has been 0 arguments against, or any workaround described yet.
I didn't realize this bot needs an explicit command. /remove-lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
Understood, fair enough. This feature request should imho be extended to the new https records, as that is basically the same idea, just a different record type
/remove-lifecycle stale imho as this is a accepted but backlogged feature request, and open to contributions, it should not go stale. I'd assume that would be `lifecycle/frozen`, but i don't...