Minh Nguyễn

I guess I don’t see the relationship between such a UI (which would be convenient to be sure) and the original problem statement. Wouldn’t the `en` locale still do double...

That’s fair, but in the meantime, we do have a bit of a problem with `crossing=traffic_signals` now being promoted so prominently. It may be a (kind of) approved tag from...

As a starting point, can we consider renaming “Crossing With Pedestrian Signals” to “Marked Crosswalk With Pedestrian Signals”, to reflect the actual documented meaning of `crossing=traffic_signals`? I don’t think that...

Oof, yep, you’re right. So for now, there’s nothing to be done about the potential for `crossing=unmarked` `crossing:signals=yes` to be changed to `crossing=traffic_signals` by mappers unaware of the hidden `crossing:signals=yes`...

> Maybe a very slight positive take on this topic: Since the preset for `crossing=unmarked` is simply called _"Unmarked Crossing"_ (and not _"Unmarked Crossing Without Traffic Signals"_), it leaves the...

Sure, and some of those cases didn’t involve iD either. I was only trying to illustrate a scenario that I think would become more likely as of the latest releases...

To clarify, I was referring to skepticism about whether the unmarked/signalized configuration can even legitimately exist in the real world – it does – but this is a good idea...

Previously openstreetmap/iD#3946.

The only potential issue I can think of is unreadable diffs caused by automatic reformatter like the one @tordans has installed. Messy diffs could make mistakes harder to spot in...

> I'm not 100% sure if this is the right approach. One issue, for example, is that the list could become outdated relatively quickly (we would kind of need a...