Minh Nguyễn

Although it would be a good idea to keep the documentation in sync, renaming the default branch through the Web interface shouldn’t break existing workflows. Anyone viewing or pulling the...

This proposal is entirely sound. The only reason mapbox/mapbox-gl-js#7626 omitted `unit` from the set of format options is that ICU hadn’t introduced this option yet. No browser would introduce support...

In Objective-C, Foundation’s `NSNumberFormatter` is extremely crufty, not based on ICU at all, but you should be able to switch to [`NSMeasurementFormatter`](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/measurementformatter?language=objc) as long as `unit` is present. (Swift has...

You’d keep an array of the [`NSUnitLength`](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/unitlength?language=objc) class methods (or maybe use introspection to obtain it) and ask each one for its [`symbol`](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/unit/symbol?language=objc). If that doesn’t cover all the units...

> and the `driving_side` is wrong more often. As noted in https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/2269#issuecomment-357154269 and [this wiki page](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/wiki/Using-location-dependent-data-in-profiles), a GeoJSON of [left-hand-drive regions](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/blob/4ee9968e3b585ee8ef28aec4a7fe3cfdea1f9ea2/data/driving_side.geojson) needs to be passed into `osrm-extract`. Otherwise, `driving_side` will...

I contacted the FOSSGIS routing server’s e-mail address to ask them to look into the missing parameter when running `osrm-extract`.

In that case, yes, there could be an entry for an air raid shelter tied to the [Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (Q3430725)](https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3430725) as the `operator`. The wiki mentions [`bunker_type=air_raid_shelter`](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bunker_type), but...

> Secondly, it's annoying when I've pressed F 10+ times on one line, then I get to a point where there's an offshoot of the line and it doesn't know...

Duplicate of #8750

> There was a question of whether this was necessary, privacy implications, LWG discussion, etc. As communicated to me, this is the decision: > > * OSM have a legitimate...