Minh Nguyễn

> I’m confused about this comment. Can you narrate the envisioned workflow, including how the user would know ahead of time what the string of numbers means? For example, if...

Just wanted to note that the OpenHistoricalMap development team is following along with interest. OHM has a different approach to recording lifecycle that doesn’t necessarily require namespacing, so we’d probably...

The ability to set style-wide state and refer to it in individual expressions would be extremely useful. Lots of client code is forced to iterate over all the layers in...

> The message says "looks like", which means that iD isn't sure. The user is still making their own judgement. "Ignore this issue" is an option. “Looks like” is the...

> ⚠️ Mark this object as operated uder branddescribed at [Citizens Bank (South Bend,Indiana)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_Bank_%28South_Bend,_Indiana%29) Wikipedia page? I find this wording a bit confusing too. Without knowing the purpose of this...

This would be a little more intuitive if the message would name the relation that you’re supposed to download, and if we’d add a button for downloading it directly to...

Right, the existing button isn’t in an intuitive place, and it also takes up some needed screen real estate. I’m hoping the design for #5420 would address that to some...

> Why splitting a road, requires to download a whole relation? In some route relations, if you split a way without first downloading the full relation, iD (or Rapid) doesn’t...

> Maybe OM should search for amenity=terminal (several terminals don't have name, or the name they have doesn't include the airport name) inside the way/relation amenity=aerodrome with the name the...

> Yeah, that's borderline crazy. Note that iD can create a bridge for itself without downloading the whole relation. So why it's forcing you to do a mere split? Splitting...