Soumik Majumder
Soumik Majumder
> One obvious thing that could happen is that one or more resources are not deleted but the app itself This would be a "known risk" I guess? We might...
> i think additional flag would be reasonable to disable this check. may be under dangerous? This approach makes sense to me
One potential risk of retrying `GET` and `LIST` calls (especially `GET` calls) might be that we might make the cause of failure worse. Since we poll the cluster using `GET`...
Adding two points, - Documenting what an ideal GitHub workflow looks like? - What is the recommended way of making these workflows/pipelines more secure? (SLSA. cosign in workflows?)
This was previously being tracked in #632
This would be cleaner and allow kctrl to use parts of kapp-controller without being dependent on a release
cc: @ThomasVitale looping you in since you were interested in this
Unprioritised for now, was previously tracked in #831
@rohitagg2020 this is resolved in the previous release right?
Gotta work towards wrapping up pending cleanup on this through a bunch of reviews @praveenrewar