Shogo Sensui
Shogo Sensui
If you are using the same version of gulp-image and its configuration, the results should be the same as you say. Is there any difference between those configurations? or if...
Also, would you check the version of binaries in node_modules?
I mean the binaries bundled by each package (`mozjpeg`, `jpeg-recompress-bin`) in `gulp-image`.
@probonopd Could you try it again with [`v2.0.1`](https://github.com/1000ch/quail/releases/tag/v2.0.1)?
The problem (mentioned on https://github.com/1000ch/quail/issues/5#issuecomment-699632415) is now solved from [`v2.0.2`](https://github.com/1000ch/quail/releases/tag/v2.0.2).
> Is there a reason that the architecture is missing in the filename? @probonopd I'm still wondering what is the problem you mentioned. Could you explain it a little bit...
The file is distributed by `electron-builder` and automatically named as `Quail-2.0.2.AppImage`. Can I ask why should that filename include the architecture?
Fair point. I'll change from `v2.0.0`.
@paaragon thank you for your idea, but it seems to be slightly redundant, is there any better way to implement it?
@xanderfrangos Hi, thank you for your contributions. Would you add tests for those options?