Daryl Maier
Daryl Maier
https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Test_openjdk17_j9_sanity.functional_s390x_linux_OMR_testList_1/623/ JCL_Test_SM_none_SCC_1 OMR Acceptance build
@DanHeidinga @pshipton : The original problem reported by this issue was investigated and a fix for that issue produced in #13885. It seems this is a second problem related to...
https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Test_openjdk8_j9_sanity.openjdk_s390x_linux_OMR_testList_2/313/
I think any change to the public-facing options behaviour needs to be done carefully with a transition plan in mind. I am open-minded to change if it makes sense, but...
Will anyone who currently has commit rights to "openj9-systemtest" and requires commit rights to that repo as part of their workflow no longer have the same rights when it moves...
Just a minor nit in that help desk issue request that the OpenJ9 license is EPL2 **or** AP2 (dual licensed).
@Spencer-Comin @hzongaro : who owns the next step on this PR? Our goal is to have this in for the 0.57 code split on Nov. 14. Thank you.
Can you share what problems you're seeing? I suspect "Daryl" might do a better job than "Bob" for this kind of problem.
A retrospective on how this source formatting experience has been in the Eclipse OMR project was discussed at the Nov 6, 2025 OMR Architecture Meeting. Replay link can be found...