Mochan
Mochan
> Thank you so much for your detailed response about my code. I have fixed it based on your instructions. I know it looks a bit rough, but you still...
Closing for now
Hey, I've glanced through the code — this is a great implementation. I'm currently going through a refactor of how `Messages` work internally to make multi-modal a bit cleaner. This...
> @0xMochan how is this one going? Wouldn't mind giving a hand if needed Hey! I'm working on it in my draft pr #199 with new message types. It's taking...
I'm kinda thinking about whether we should move the rig-docs to this repo directly instead of a separate repo and use the standard rust-book style of docs for simplicity. it...
1. We do not currently have _any_ multimodal inputs. 3. There definitely are plans but it would require a greater in-depth look at our current API to figure out where...
The plan for this PR is to (manually) cherry pick the changes into the streaming refactor from #388 .
TBH, i'm not too fond of a crate (even if internal) that is only used to reduce duplication among examples. the examples' duplications come from the fact that we lack...
@crStiv it seems like the last commit you've pushed hasn't fixed the `cargo fmt` issue, can you also rebase w/ main so that this is up to date!
When MCP support was first PRed, I don't think anthropic even had a `rust-sdk` out yet. This is just the nature of how fast this space moves. iirc, @stevohuncho's goal...