Pepa
Pepa
Hehe yea this is "hell" of being non native english speaker.... In 🇨🇿 (czech} language I could even drop "I" and from form of verb of "may" you could backtrack...
yeah but i do not know if synchronous version should stay or should be converted othervise i will likely use this ( it support trio any io and asyncio (curio...
also i see it like this types and testing them even internaly (bigest pain) then maybe optional converting to clases then async
ok i am fine with async going 1st as well i think i will do a mirror image of curent api that will be async and wrap it someting like...
this will take longer then expexted https://github.com/kevin1024/vcrpy/issues/656
and there is fix for pyvcr it is currently a blocker https://github.com/kevin1024/vcrpy/pull/657
This is not a big thing or issue but it would help others customize api and shorten their code
i am also willing to add this
option 3 for me work as well... idealy do not make hard dependency on some tool (but if needed it may be done and i will not evangelize pydantic furher...
@yezz123 this can be closed already present here with test and merged https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic-extra-types/pull/176