zephyr
zephyr copied to clipboard
drivers: missing spi commands in mipi dbi driver
Describe the bug LCD screen does not display images correctly since last ili9xxx drivers update. There are some commands missing when probing the SPI bus. Here is what is sent on the bus since the update:
With previous ili9xxx drivers:
Logs and console output Debugger shows that the calls to send 0x2a and 0x2b are executed:
Breakpoint 1, mipi_dbi_spi_write_helper (dev=<optimized out>, dbi_config=0x800a9e4 <ili9xxx_config_0+8>, cmd_present=cmd_present@entry=true, cmd=<optimized out>, data_buf=0x200019ac <z_main_stack+876> "", len=len@entry=4) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/mipi_dbi/mipi_dbi_spi.c:103
103 ret = spi_write(config->spi_dev, &dbi_config->config,
(gdb) print buf_set->buffers->len
$7 = 1
(gdb) x/1bx buf_set->buffers->buf
0x2000195f <z_main_stack+799>: 0x2b
Environment (please complete the following information):
- OS: GNU/Linux (LMDE 5)
- Toolchain: Zephyr SDK
- Zephyr branch #6fc6b30f (before MIPI DBI driver update) and #5f31c15b (after driver update)
- Display sample application
- Out-of-tree board: https://github.com/everedero/board_st_mb1283
- SPI slowed down to 1MHz for probing
@everedero are you compiling with some form of optimizations enabled? Based on the probe you sent it seems that [ili9xxx_set_mem_area](https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/main/drivers/display/display_ili9xxx.c#L57 is simply not sending the command bytes. I can't reproduce this locally, compiling samples/drivers/display for the lpcxpresso55s69_cpu0 target with the command west build -p always -b lpcxpresso55s69_cpu0 samples/drivers/display/ -DSHIELD='adafruit_2_8_tft_touch_v2'
I'm testing on SHA 49c7f43561e, with the SPI clock slowed to 1.5MHz
It might be a platform-specific issue, because ili9xxx_set_mem_area does jump into the SPI HAL, even for 0x2a and 0x2b commands:
#0 transceive (asynchronous=false, cb=0x0, userdata=0x0, rx_bufs=0x0, tx_bufs=<optimized out>, config=0x802d9c8 <ili9xxx_config_0+12>, dev=0x802d200 <__device_dts_ord_50>) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/spi/spi_ll_stm32.c:773
#1 spi_stm32_transceive (dev=0x802d200 <__device_dts_ord_50>, config=0x802d9c8 <ili9xxx_config_0+12>, tx_bufs=<optimized out>, rx_bufs=0x0) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/spi/spi_ll_stm32.c:1094
#2 0x0801e182 in z_impl_spi_transceive (rx_bufs=0x0, tx_bufs=0x2000dff8 <z_main_stack+1464>, config=0x802d9c8 <ili9xxx_config_0+12>, dev=<optimized out>) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/zephyr/include/zephyr/drivers/spi.h:761
#3 spi_transceive (rx_bufs=0x0, tx_bufs=0x2000dff8 <z_main_stack+1464>, config=0x802d9c8 <ili9xxx_config_0+12>, dev=<optimized out>) at /home/eve/Documents/zephyr_misc/zephyr_st25/build/zephyr/include/generated/syscalls/spi.h:38
#4 spi_write (tx_bufs=0x2000dff8 <z_main_stack+1464>, config=0x802d9c8 <ili9xxx_config_0+12>, dev=<optimized out>) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/zephyr/include/zephyr/drivers/spi.h:851
#5 mipi_dbi_spi_write_helper (dbi_config=0x802d9c4 <ili9xxx_config_0+8>, cmd_present=cmd_present@entry=true, cmd=<optimized out>, data_buf=0x2000e04c <z_main_stack+1548> "", len=len@entry=4, dev=<optimized out>)
at /home/eve/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/mipi_dbi/mipi_dbi_spi.c:103
#6 0x0801e1e2 in mipi_dbi_spi_command_write (dev=<optimized out>, dbi_config=<optimized out>, cmd=<optimized out>, data_buf=<optimized out>, len=4) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/mipi_dbi/mipi_dbi_spi.c:136
#7 0x0801e3ea in mipi_dbi_command_write (len=4, data=0x2000e00c <z_main_stack+1484> "\274\331\002\b7", cmd=42 '*', config=<optimized out>, dev=<optimized out>) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/zephyr/include/zephyr/drivers/mipi_dbi.h:167
#8 ili9xxx_transmit (dev=dev@entry=0x802d228 <__device_dts_ord_52>, cmd=cmd@entry=42 '*', tx_data=tx_data@entry=0x2000e04c <z_main_stack+1548>, tx_len=tx_len@entry=4)
at /home/eve/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/display/display_ili9xxx.c:29
#9 0x0801e4d6 in ili9xxx_set_mem_area (h=36, w=<optimized out>, y=55, x=<optimized out>, dev=0x802d228 <__device_dts_ord_52>) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/display/display_ili9xxx.c:66
#10 ili9xxx_write (dev=0x802d228 <__device_dts_ord_52>, x=<optimized out>, y=<optimized out>, desc=0x2000e0a0 <z_main_stack+1632>, buf=0x20005020 <buf0>) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/display/display_ili9xxx.c:103
#11 0x0802c4da in display_write (buf=<optimized out>, desc=0x2000e0a0 <z_main_stack+1632>, y=<optimized out>, x=<optimized out>, dev=<optimized out>) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/zephyr/include/zephyr/drivers/display.h:250
#12 lvgl_flush_display (request=request@entry=0x2000e098 <z_main_stack+1624>) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/zephyr/modules/lvgl/lvgl_display.c:115
#13 0x0802c6de in lvgl_flush_cb_24bit (disp_drv=<optimized out>, area=<optimized out>, color_p=<optimized out>) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/zephyr/modules/lvgl/lvgl_display_24bit.c:26
#14 0x08022ff6 in call_flush_cb (drv=<optimized out>, area=<optimized out>, color_p=<optimized out>) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/modules/lib/gui/lvgl/src/core/lv_refr.c:1327
#15 0x0800845c in draw_buf_flush (disp=<optimized out>) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/modules/lib/gui/lvgl/src/core/lv_refr.c:1302
#16 refr_area_part (draw_ctx=draw_ctx@entry=0x20000bd4 <lvgl_heap_mem+596>) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/modules/lib/gui/lvgl/src/core/lv_refr.c:798
#17 0x08008c52 in refr_area (area_p=<optimized out>) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/modules/lib/gui/lvgl/src/core/lv_refr.c:680
#18 refr_invalid_areas () at /home/eve/zephyrproject/modules/lib/gui/lvgl/src/core/lv_refr.c:618
#19 _lv_disp_refr_timer (tmr=<optimized out>) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/modules/lib/gui/lvgl/src/core/lv_refr.c:325
#20 0x080142ea in lv_timer_exec (timer=0x20000c34 <lvgl_heap_mem+692>) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/modules/lib/gui/lvgl/src/misc/lv_timer.c:313
#21 lv_timer_handler () at /home/eve/zephyrproject/modules/lib/gui/lvgl/src/misc/lv_timer.c:109
#22 0x08000a58 in lv_task_handler () at /home/eve/zephyrproject/modules/lib/gui/lvgl/src/../src/lv_api_map.h:37
#23 main () at /home/eve/Documents/zephyr_misc/zephyr_st25/game/src/main.c:98
With:
(gdb) x/1bx tx_bufs->buffers->buf
0x2000195f <z_main_stack+799>: 0x2a
I am using debug optimizations (CONFIG_DEBUG_OPTIMIZATIONS=y). I tried to disable all the optimizations (CONFIG_NO_OPTIMIZATIONS=y... and CONFIG_MAIN_STACK_SIZE=4096 to avoid consequential stack overflow), but the issue persists.
For reference, this is what the screen looks like with this 0x2a and 0x2b missing commands issue. Since it does not receive the coordinates correctly, the grey pixels from the display sample are stashed in a line on one side of the screen, instead of being in a square.
Working display sample:
It might be a platform-specific issue, because ili9xxx_set_mem_area does jump into the SPI HAL, even for 0x2a and 0x2b commands
Maybe so- this one is really strange to me. I'm trying to think what is different about the CASET and PASET commands. I've tested on an ST board just to be sure, and my ILI9xxx display works fine there (with west build -p always -b nucleo_l433rc_p samples/drivers/display/ -DSHIELD='adafruit_2_8_tft_touch_v2' -DCONFIG_DEBUG_OPTIMIZATIONS=y). Are there any other commands that you see being missed when running the sample? Does it fail consistently?
It does fail consistently, always the same 0x2a and 0x2b disappearing behaviour. I tried to compare initialization commands in both cases, and only some commands are missing, never data: ok_vs_ko.ods
It does fail consistently, always the same 0x2a and 0x2b disappearing behaviour. I tried to compare initialization commands in both cases, and only some commands are missing, never data: ok_vs_ko.ods
Ok, so only the command is absent. I'm really not sure what would differ on your setup. You said the HAL is being called to send the command byte. A few questions:
- is data itself being written out to the hardware (IE at the register level?)
- If you add a delay here: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/main/drivers/mipi_dbi/mipi_dbi_spi.c#L103 using
k_sleepbefore sending the data bytes, do you see the command bytes on the wire with the signal analyzer? - the SPI buffer length is set to 1 for the command phase, correct? It looks like the
bufpointer is correct
- The delay does not change the behaviour:
-
I think nothing gets written to the hardware, it seems like it never gets to the SPIx->DR register modification (also, hardware breakpoints seem to crash my debugger sessions, so it is hard to know for sure)
-
So far I have tracked the issue to: not always jumping into spi_stm32_isr:
Breakpoint 7, transceive (dev=0x8009a04 <__device_dts_ord_47>, config=0x800a9e8 <ili9xxx_config_0+12>, tx_bufs=0x20001960 <z_main_stack+800>, rx_bufs=0x0, asynchronous=asynchronous@entry=false, cb=cb@entry=0x0, userdata=userdata@entry=0x0) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/spi/spi_ll_stm32.c:842
842 ret = spi_context_wait_for_completion(&data->ctx);
(gdb) print tx_bufs->buffers->len
$94 = 1
(gdb) x /1bx tx_bufs->buffers->buf
0x2000195f <z_main_stack+799>: 0x2a
// Should reach breakpoint 11 in ISR here
Breakpoint 7, transceive (dev=0x8009a04 <__device_dts_ord_47>, config=0x800a9e8 <ili9xxx_config_0+12>, tx_bufs=0x20001960 <z_main_stack+800>, rx_bufs=0x0, asynchronous=asynchronous@entry=false, cb=cb@entry=0x0, userdata=userdata@entry=0x0) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/spi/spi_ll_stm32.c:842
842 ret = spi_context_wait_for_completion(&data->ctx);
(gdb) print tx_bufs->buffers->len
$95 = 4
(gdb) x /4bx tx_bufs->buffers->buf
0x200019ac <z_main_stack+876>: 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x3b
Breakpoint 11, spi_stm32_isr (dev=0x8009a04 <__device_dts_ord_47>) at /home/eve/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/spi/spi_ll_stm32.c:526
526 if (spi_stm32_transfer_ongoing(data)) {
The display works if I disable interrupt mode for SPI driver:
CONFIG_SPI_STM32_INTERRUPT=n
I took a look at your board, and I'm wondering if the duplex property is the issue- the MIPI DBI header file is currently handling this property incorrectly. Can you try running the display sample with https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/69200 and see if it works correctly?
No, #69200 doesn't affect my issue
No, https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/69200 doesn't affect my issue
Hmm, ok- can you try removing the duplex property from your display node? That is the only significant difference I see between your display devicetree and the ones in tree.
You might also want to try running the display sample with CONFIG_SPI_LOG_LEVEL_DBG=y, to see what this line prints: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/main/drivers/spi/spi_ll_stm32.c#L675
I tried with duplex removed, still with the fix, with no success.
Logging gives:
<dbg> spi_ll_stm32: spi_stm32_configure: Installed config 0x802ceec: freq 10500000Hz (div = 4), mode 0/0/0, slave 0
@erwango do you have any thoughts here? I'm not clear what changes would cause this to fail. I'm not sure this is a platform specific problem, but I have been unable to reproduce it on other boards thus far
@ajarmouni-st ^^
@ajarmouni-st ^^
I was already following the discussion, & I don't really have an idea about what could be causing this
The display works if I disable interrupt mode for SPI driver: CONFIG_SPI_STM32_INTERRUPT=n
(debugging IT issues is a nightmare).
Maybe I could somehow try to record the exact calls the display driver is sending to the SPI driver, and compare the old and the new driver calls and timings? There has to be a tiny difference from the upper levels to trigger a different behaviour in lower levels, it cannot just be a curse from my desk, right? :thinking:
I tried tracing, it is not helping me much, but here it is. The traces record a display_write call. The 2 semaphores traced are ctx.lock and ctx.sync:
- spi_stm32_dev_data_0.ctx.lock.wait_q.waitq <spi_stm32_dev_data_0+16>
- spi_stm32_dev_data_0.ctx.sync.wait_q.waitq <spi_stm32_dev_data_0+36>
trace_not_working.txt trace_working.txt
I also tried to print logs directly from the IRQ itself, it looks like it does not disrupt anything after all (the "." is a printk when entering IRQ): log_not_working.txt log_working.txt
I will add more detailed logging, until it either give me interesting information or make everything collapse :smiley:
Turns out everything works if I comment out the spinlock calls in mipi_dbi_spi_write_helper (drivers/mipi_dbi/mipi_dbi_spi.c:61 and 127).
k_spinlock_key_t spinlock_key = k_spin_lock(&data->lock);
The two missing interrupts popping between MIPI driver call and STM32 SPI LL driver call are back, for some reasons.
Turns out everything works if I comment out the spinlock calls in mipi_dbi_spi_write_helper (drivers/mipi_dbi/mipi_dbi_spi.c:61 and 127).
k_spinlock_key_t spinlock_key = k_spin_lock(&data->lock);
The two missing interrupts popping between MIPI driver call and STM32 SPI LL driver call are back, for some reasons.
Wow. This is bad- looking at the implementation I did there, that should absolutely be a mutex. Blocking interrupts here doesn't make sense. Unless you'd like to, I'll send a PR (as well as a backport) to fix this