Minimal changes for GraalVM compatibility

[kwojcik-blockether]

Hi @zelark! Thank you for the nano-id. I found that the current implementation is not compatible with GraalVM, because of extensive use of SecureRandom in static fields.

I found in benchmarks a little slowdown, but please confirm it on your side.

[zelark]

Hi @FieryCod, thanks for your contribution. I think it's a good point to have GraalVM compatibility. I'll check it later.

[kwojcik-blockether]

Sure thing. Feel free to ping me when necessary 😀

[coreagile]

When do folks think this can get merged in?