zekronium

I see that the `DnsClient`, just like in `4.x`, is not used for internal DNS resolution in `5.x` too, where `AddressResolverGroup` is used. Is there a plan to change that?...

> it is normal that the DNS client is not used for resolution, since we rely on a resolver which does more than a client, so DoH should be contributed...

> we cannot accept it as is, unless there is a guarantee that it will be provided in Netty (to avoid a feature regression). > > perhaps the best would...

No chance of this landing on 4.x too? What is the ETA for 5.x?

@vietj It should be good for review and open for changes if needed

@vietj Why not have it as an optional dependency. Might take while, whilst other projects are already using it such as netty reactor

> [netty/netty#14979](https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/14979) 🎆 Still need http3 codec

Optimally would be nice to have the ability to do both, but in SIMD spirit, lazy parsing seems more appropriate, especially once full on stream parsing is eligible, that can...

@franz1981 Why is the heap buffer not pooled, shouldn't it be a almost free lunch in performance?

In my testing version "GraalVM CE 21.0.2+13.1" seems to not throw this error anymore