Zach Daniel
Zach Daniel
I was able to find some issues with the example for recursive relationships in `AshPostgres`, but ultimately there is a larger issue here that unfortunately I just don't think that...
To align with what that means generally, we'd say something like `private? true` in the action. Although to align with 3.0 it would be something like `public? false` (and if...
I've labeled this as a "good first issue", as implementing it in core will be easy. Once that is done, issues will need to be opened in `AshGraphql`, `AshJsonApi`, and...
I think what we would likely still require, however, is something like this in policies: ```elixir bypass private_action?() do authorize_if always() end ``` But it becomes safer to include a...
Console usage would be quite hard to detect unfortunately. I'm not sure if it's reasonable.
Because if it uses process dictionary for example internal action calls by the action would think they are in the console too
Is this when loading the relationship? In what context did you observe this behavior?
oh, I see. its not honoring it in `exists`? Interesting...
I can't reproduce this. I think we'll need either an example test case or a reproduction project to move forward. The 2.0 github branch is up to date with the...
🤔 I'm not sure that makes sense. You could have an admin user editing a user other than themselves. The `references_source?` relationship points at the user being edited, the `belongs_to_actor`...