Zach Daniel
Zach Daniel
This is definitely an interesting idea. There are some complexities w/ the construction if the action type is itself `extend`. But if we were to do it like so: ```elixir...
I'm on board for the structure laid out, but not the term `template` (which was my term in the first place I'm aware 🙃) Ultimately we're talking about something that...
I think `fragment` is the best name for it, but unfortunately that is kind of taken...We could call them `action_fragments` i.e ```elixir action_fragments do ... end ``` Alternatively, what we...
I'm cautious of conflating terms, and these terms are kind of related. i.e "how do I share action behavior? With fragments, no, not that kind of fragment, this kind of...
Is there an idea of how this would end up being supported? Would the search for these get build when the docs are built? If so where would it get...
I opened up an issue #1637 that may also be a place to start, which I think can be implemented quite easily. Essentially allowing for links of type `:custom` or...
😆 thanks for pointing it out, and yeah that definitely seems just like an extra sentence. Will remove!
Fixed :)
It's good enough to close this issue, but some cases where we say things like just "object" where it could be more specified. Not a big deal, just improvements to...