Willem Pienaar

> I was thinking entity key. Only as an option - there are use cases for enabling both of them. > > For example, if our machine learning deployment is...

> Can I give this a go and raise a PR for File based offlinestore only? > > I'll stick the spec written(?), though I noticed elsewhere in the repo...

@felixwang9817 do you have more details on this request? Specifically what problem is being solved?

@fcas are you asking for us to add support for specifying a role for DynamoDB (which is distinct from the offline store)? I think that should be a pretty easy...

I think we should maybe move away from specifying the role and instead use profiles (like [dbt](https://docs.getdbt.com/reference/warehouse-profiles/redshift-profile) does). cc @tsotnet @achals for opinions.

@fcas Can you explain why you need to scale `apply` and `createTable` permissions to the whole company? Normally only one team controls `apply` through CI. Readers of DynamoDB don't need...

Hi @vecorro, you are free to use Parquet. Just be aware of the fact that you won't get nearly the same performance without a scalable system like a cloud datawarehouse.

Hey @yanghua, Thanks for raising this issue! I think it may be worth considering how most user will want to consume metrics. I don't know if we have very good...

@adchia was this actually fixed?

Sure, feel free to ship a PR