Titus

### Initial checklist - [X] I read the [support docs](https://github.com/rehypejs/.github/blob/main/support.md) - [X] I read the [contributing guide](https://github.com/rehypejs/.github/blob/main/contributing.md) - [X] I agree to follow the [code of conduct](https://github.com/rehypejs/.github/blob/main/code-of-conduct.md) - [X] I...

rehype-mathjax: use `abstractAdopter` instead of `jsdomAdaptor` / `browserAdaptor`

5

### Problem JsDom is heavy, and an alternative to rehype, which we’re already using. It’s probably better to use `AbstractAdopter` and map it to hast, instead of using `jsdomAdaptor` /...

Investigate shipping `.dic`, `.aff` as JSON

2

Problem: * Uses Node-specific APIs, so doesn’t work in browsers, Deno * Ships a weird callback load function, would be nicer to use the module system to do that Solution:...

Q: `useRollingCache: true` still results in `npm ci`, but `npm ci` removes `node_modules`?

2

I’m trying to make a build (mdx-js/mdx) much faster, and am testing `useRollingCache: true`. It doesn’t seem to do much. Could that be because it still uses `npm ci` ([proof...

remark@next (13)

36

Hi! remark is switching to a new parser (and compiler) internally ([micromark](https://github.com/micromark/micromark), [`remarkjs/remark#536`](https://github.com/remarkjs/remark/pull/536)), which will break several of these plugins. Several of the remark plugins, such as frontmatter, footnotes, math,...

Prior thinking

3

Hey this looks interesting! Nice work. It’s not really the same, but I’ve spent the last five years thinking about similar problems, with [unist](https://github.com/syntax-tree/unist), [mdast](https://github.com/syntax-tree/mdast) (markdown), [hast](https://github.com/syntax-tree/hast) (html), and [nlcst](https://github.com/syntax-tree/nlcst)...

Hi! remark is switching to a new parser internally ([micromark](https://github.com/micromark/micromark), see [`remarkjs/remark#536`](https://github.com/remarkjs/remark/pull/536) for more info). From a quick glance at the code, it seems this plugin should be fine. However,...

Rename `code` -> `codeFlow`, `inlineCode` -> `codeText`

2

### Subject of the feature Related to GH-33, be more clear in types what the node reflects.

Rename `depth` to `rank`

2

### Subject of the feature Rank is the term used by HTML. Depth alludes a bit to nesting, which is not the case.

### Subject of the feature It’s funky that we use one for html, but two for code. As they’re such different things, that should be reflected in their types. ###...