Will Abramson

I just wanted to say I too was confused by this comment @jandrieu and wondered if you had the DID WG work in mind when you raised it? VCDM moved...

I believe that is from the current charter based on the recent extension - https://www.w3.org/2024/10/vc-wg-charter.html. The charter covering the period when the change you are referring to is this https://www.w3.org/2022/06/verifiable-credentials-wg-charter.html

@FabioPinheiro I think I also thought along these lines, hence the PR #874. But, I do think the spec text is accurate. Section 3.2 DID URL Syntax, includes [Section 3.2.1...

Echoing @iherman from the call yesterday, I am wondering what following the W3C registry process gets us. I think @jandrieu makes a valid point, that it is a new process...

> This was discussed during the [did meeting on 23 January 2025](https://www.w3.org/2025/01/23-did-minutes.html#ffe3). Based on discussion, it was agreed that this issue has been addressed. Marking pending close.

The working group discussed this and passed the following resolution. >RESOLUTION: Allow multiple registrations in the DID Methods extensions list but make it clear in the registration process that doing...

This has been merged. Marking pending close

> This was discussed during the [did meeting on 23 January 2025](https://www.w3.org/2025/01/23-did-minutes.html#04f3). I do not think we reached consensus on what to do with this issue. @msporny advocated for it...

I am not sure this is something that the resolution spec needs to address. To me, DID Methods specify the VDR / VDRs that they operate over. In the case...

> It's unlikely that you can always make a determination about which VDR will be the one best associated with the method after a fork. For example, ETH followed the...