Shimmy

That would be awesome!

`var` could be omitted.

My personal preference would be omitting the `var`. If you don't specifiy a type, you mean you want an inferred `const` type, though `var` can be allowed for those who...

> if some wants a different type than the compiler chose, just type it. same applies for var, as well. Or if someone wants to 'declare' they're type-inferring they could...

In addition, SelectionChanged is not fired when SelectedItems is changed in multiple selection mode.

This is a critical issue to me. My entire XAML validation system is based on WPF validation rules, it reads the field and entity model from the `BindingExpression` and creates...

INDEI requires you to implement all your entities and sub entities. Using rules, no changes are required, it all works automatically using validation attributes only.

You're right, but that requires your entities to be non POCOs. I should give it a try tho. Might not be so bad using an `EntityBase` class in a LoB...

> > INDEI requires you to implement all your entities and sub entities. > > Can you elaborate more on this? With my code, all POCO entities can remain free...

It only supports parameter name verification, not expected message. In custom `ArgumentException`s, this can be important.