yalc
yalc copied to clipboard
bin symlink goes to .yalc instead of node_modules copy
I'm working on a package that has a generated aspect.
It has a CLI to run the generation.
When generation runs, the package expects to find itself within node_modules.
The problem is that the node_modules/.bin file symlinks (it seems) to the .yalc location, rather than the node_modules/... location.
In turn this breaks my current case since the generated library parts are going into the wrong directory now:

In the above .yalc should be node_modules.
Sorry, I'm not following. Try to explain the steps you make to get the issue, or maybe there could be a repro example.
- Create a package
Awith a bin specified in package.json yalc add Ain some other projectByalc pushAAgets put intoBlike normal, but itsbinscript is symlinked intoB/.yalc/A/... it should be pointing towardB/node_modules/A.
Right. There seems not need bin sysmlinks are created while add operation. Will fix it soon.
Also @wclr I am seeing issues with regard to needing to run chmod +x over the bin file. Maybe related to https://github.com/wclr/yalc/issues/21. I assume package managers do this chmod +x automatically and its just that yalc is not right now?
I am seeing issues with regard to needing to run chmod +x over the bin file.
What bin file? Where it is located?
Actually, I'm a little bit confused with this thing with .bin scripts, which was added but a contributor's PR. I generally never use linking and never run into those issue, cause I generally use --pure adding. I believe linking of bin script from .yalc folder need only if yalc link or yalc add --link (yarn's link: protocol), if just yalc add is used then PM should take care of installing bin scripts.
I used yalc push --force and yalc add.
What bin file? Where it is located?
In the package where run yalc push --force. The script is listed in package.json bin field. Location should not matter. Whatever the value of bin in package.json is.
Location should not matter. Whatever the value of bin in package.json is.
I mean is it related to this code?
Do you have the stack trace?
I mean is it related to this code?
Yep seems it would be!
I've found in this situation where you are exclusively working on some ./node_modules/.bin/{foo,bar}, npm link (6/7/?) works better than yalc.
One reason I say this is that I found yalc was not installing dependencies from the external library/npm package. I think with npm link it's irrelevant. Your libraries deps are not mixed into your primary projects node_modules.