Alex

@staltz hello, what do you say?

Maybe `ResponseStream` is not very good naming here.

I don't know what is was meant by @staltz under `ResponseStream`, maybe should reviewed/reconsidered and made consistent to avoid such word ambiguity.

@3n-mb This question was discussed many times, about is there is a need in a pull in HTTP like drivers, it seems like it breaks cyclic semantic and basically approach....

> You see, I am trying to sell cycle to my team, to actual consumers of a framework. They give feedback. I bring this feedback to cyclejs issues. Devs are...

> but my fear is that he will miss a bigger pull opportunity due to narrowing on a tiny element while wasting time by breaking existing streams, which doesn't seem...

I believe it is outof scope of cycle/run itself, but should be just wrapper lib for `run`.

I think `window` is really outside of DOM (which is Document Object Model) context. There is probably a need in *official* `window` driver that will also be able to produce...

I don't really think that this should be embedded in driver's land. Driver should provide standard things, like DOM events (which are typed quite well, but could be better to...

> Your bin is slightly different than what you have pasted in the description. I probably modified it by chance after submitting the issue. Thanks for picking this up. So...