charter-drafts icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
charter-drafts copied to clipboard

Published 20 hours ago • verified publisher icon w3c

[wg/fedid] Shouldn't there be a liaison with the DID Working Group?

Open iherman opened this issue 1 year ago • 2 comments

I would think a relationship to the Decentralized Identifier Working Group is very much relevant...

cc @pchampin @burnburn @brentzundel

iherman avatar Apr 19 '24 04:04 iherman

DiD seems further away in the satck. Ie, it may be used within the credential format but the Digital Credentials API doesn't dive within the credential.

plehegar avatar Apr 19 '24 06:04 plehegar

But whatever the API is, it should be usable for DIDs as well. It may be trivial, but I think a liaison with the DID WG to ensure that would still be good.

iherman avatar Apr 19 '24 06:04 iherman

I agree @iherman I would like to see what we can do to ensure that DIDs are compatible with the APIs defined by the new group.

decentralgabe avatar May 14 '24 19:05 decentralgabe

thank you @iherman and @decentralgabe for your comments. we've been thinking about it, and although it's actually "far away" in terms of the stack as @plehegar correctly says, at the ecosystem level DID is one of the pillars of Decentralized Idenities, so we're working to include it among the liaisons.

skos:related https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/450

simoneonofri avatar May 15 '24 15:05 simoneonofri