Add owl-time

[browser-specs-bot]

URL

https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/

Rationale

• See repository: w3c/sdw
• Would-be shortname: owl-time

Additional properties

{
  "categories": [
    "-browser"
  ]
}

[browser-specs-bot]

Changes to index.json

This update would trigger the following changes in index.json:

Add spec (1)

{
  "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/",
  "seriesComposition": "full",
  "shortname": "owl-time",
  "series": {
    "shortname": "owl-time",
    "currentSpecification": "owl-time",
    "title": "Time Ontology in OWL",
    "shortTitle": "Time Ontology in OWL",
    "releaseUrl": "https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/",
    "nightlyUrl": "https://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/"
  },
  "organization": "W3C/OGC",
  "nightly": {
    "url": "https://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/",
    "status": "Editor's Draft",
    "sourcePath": "time/index.html",
    "alternateUrls": [],
    "repository": "https://github.com/w3c/sdw",
    "filename": "index.html"
  },
  "groups": [
    {
      "name": "Spatio-temporal Data on the Web Working Group",
      "url": "https://www.w3.org/2021/sdw"
    }
  ],
  "release": {
    "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/",
    "status": "Candidate Recommendation Draft",
    "filename": "Overview.html"
  },
  "title": "Time Ontology in OWL",
  "source": "w3c",
  "shortTitle": "Time Ontology in OWL",
  "categories": [],
  "standing": "good"
}

Tests

These changes look good! 😎

Crawl results for Time Ontology in OWL

Crawl summary:

• Title: Time Ontology in OWL
• Authoring tool: respec
• Date: 15 November 2022
• Canonical URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/
• Spec defines:
  • Headings: 132 found
  • IDs: 364 found
  • Links: 56 rawlinks
  • References: 6 normative, 19 informative
• No Algorithms, CDDL, CSS, Events, Terms, Web IDL definitions found

[dontcallmedom]

sourcePath is wrong (missing the time/ directory)

[github-actions[bot]]

The specification was updated on 2022-11-09 (last reviewed on 2025-02-10).

[tidoust]

This spec should be added to the list. On top of fixing sourcePath, it would be good to surface the fact that this is joint W3C/OGC work. Now our data model can accommodate specs produced by 1 group from 1 organization, it can also accommodate specs produced by 1000 groups from 1 organization, but it cannot accommodate specs produced by only 1 group from 1000 organizations... And there is just one group here, the Spatial Data on the Web Working Group, which is a joint W3C-OGC effort.

I propose to set organization to "W3C/OGC", in particular because we already use that same convention with a slash for ISO/IEC entries in the list (JPEG, JPEG-XL, Open Font Format).

[tidoust]

@browser-specs-bot pr