Vyas Ramasubramani
Vyas Ramasubramani
I agree, let's not discuss any further on this thread. My two cents: I'd actually vote to table this discussion entirely for the moment. At this point we're stuck with...
I'm sympathetic to that, but my concern is that in the current state the names that I would want will only be semi-accurate, and worse, may have to change again...
@bdice yes, the offsets don't get correctly incremented in pretend mode but they should when actually submitting. I don't remember the _exact_ reason for this, but it's basically because of...
@b-butler could you have a look at this? I just realized that we've let this slide, and I don't have time to look into it right now. Offhand I'd guess...
@kidrahahjo while this feature would be nice, I would recommend working on something else for the moment if you have the time. There are higher priority items to be worked...
Same as the question on #739, @klywang what is this PR waiting on? Reviews? Do we need to ping people to have a look, or is there more work to...
@csadorf It feels like we are slowly coming full circle back to the original signac-flow API, no? :smile: This is looking eerily similar to ``` class Project(FlowProject): def __init__(self): self.add_operation(...)...
Due to the changes made in #184, any logic that we apply here will now probably live in the Environment classes. We may need to use the `cmd_suffix` as well....
I see a lot of good points being made here. I don't have a strong opinion regarding the aesthetics of the API that @bdice mentioned, but I do agree with...
Thanks Justin!