vitest UnhandledRejection: process.memoryUsage

Describe the bug

𝐇ello˙. 𝐀m 𝐈 doing something wrong˙? ಥ_ಥ

Run the following script:

"test:browser": "vitest run",

It runs correctly. (｡◕‿‿◕｡)

Run the following script:

"test:browser-flaky": "vitest run --browser.enabled=true",

Message output in console ⚆ _ ⚆

❯ npm run test:browser-flaky

> test:browser-flaky
> vitest run --browser.enabled=true


 RUN  v2.1.1 /home/projects/vitest-dev-vitest-gmzfxl
      Browser runner started at http://localhost:5173/
      Coverage enabled with v8


⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Unhandled Errors ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

Vitest caught 2 unhandled errors during the test run.
This might cause false positive tests. Resolve unhandled errors to make sure your tests are not affected.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Coverage Error ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
Error: CDP is not supported by the provider "preview".
 ❯ receiverOnMessage node_modules/ws/lib/websocket.js:1220:20
 ❯ dataMessage node_modules/ws/lib/receiver.js:596:14
 ❯ getData node_modules/ws/lib/receiver.js:496:10
 ❯ startLoop node_modules/ws/lib/receiver.js:167:16
 ❯ _write node_modules/ws/lib/receiver.js:94:10
 ❯ socketOnData node_modules/ws/lib/websocket.js:1355:35
 ❯ _0x26b1b3/< ../../../blitz.28a8ce1b.js:40:516951
 ❯ _0x4d0c70/< ../../../blitz.28a8ce1b.js:40:518489
 ❯ _0x132427/< ../../../blitz.28a8ce1b.js:40:195670
 ❯ _0x4f7512 ../../../blitz.28a8ce1b.js:40:195775
 ❯ _0x4d0c70 ../../../blitz.28a8ce1b.js:40:518414
 ❯ _0x3e05c5/< ../../../blitz.28a8ce1b.js:40:519146
 ❯ _0x3e05c5 ../../../blitz.28a8ce1b.js:40:519125
 ❯ _0x1a4990 ../../../blitz.28a8ce1b.js:40:518751
 ❯ _0x38702d ../../../blitz.28a8ce1b.js:40:517760


⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Unhandled Rejection ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
Error: CDP is not supported by the provider "preview".
 ❯ receiverOnMessage node_modules/ws/lib/websocket.js:1220:20
 ❯ dataMessage node_modules/ws/lib/receiver.js:596:14
 ❯ getData node_modules/ws/lib/receiver.js:496:10
 ❯ startLoop node_modules/ws/lib/receiver.js:167:16
 ❯ _write node_modules/ws/lib/receiver.js:94:10
 ❯ socketOnData node_modules/ws/lib/websocket.js:1355:35
 ❯ _0x26b1b3/< ../../../blitz.28a8ce1b.js:40:516951
 ❯ _0x4d0c70/< ../../../blitz.28a8ce1b.js:40:518489
 ❯ _0x132427/< ../../../blitz.28a8ce1b.js:40:195670
 ❯ _0x4f7512 ../../../blitz.28a8ce1b.js:40:195775
 ❯ _0x4d0c70 ../../../blitz.28a8ce1b.js:40:518414
 ❯ _0x3e05c5/< ../../../blitz.28a8ce1b.js:40:519146
 ❯ _0x3e05c5 ../../../blitz.28a8ce1b.js:40:519125
 ❯ _0x1a4990 ../../../blitz.28a8ce1b.js:40:518751
 ❯ _0x38702d ../../../blitz.28a8ce1b.js:40:517760

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

 Test Files  no tests
      Tests  no tests
     Errors  2 errors
   Start at  17:31:33
   Duration  12.91s (transform 0ms, setup 0ms, collect 0ms, tests 0ms, environment 0ms, prepare 0ms)

 % @vitest/coverage-v8 does not work on Stackblitz. Report will be empty.
 % Coverage report from v8
-------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
File         | % Stmts | % Branch | % Funcs | % Lines | Uncovered Line #s 
-------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
All files    |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
 ...t-gmzfxl |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  ...nfig.js |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-31              
 ...zfxl/src |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 |                   
  index.js   |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-2               
  ...test.js |       0 |        0 |       0 |       0 | 1-9               
-------------|---------|----------|---------|---------|-------------------
[UnhandledPromiseRejection: This error originated either by throwing inside of an async function without a catch block, or by rejecting a promise which was not handled with .catch(). The promise rejected with the reason "TypeError: this.server is undefined".] {
  code: 'ERR_UNHANDLED_REJECTION'
}

Node.js v18.20.3

Run the following script:

"test:browser-error": "vitest run --browser.enabled=true --coverage.enabled=false"

Message output in console ⚆ _ ⚆

❯ npm run test:browser-error

> test:browser-error
> vitest run --browser.enabled=true --coverage.enabled=false


 RUN  v2.1.1 /home/projects/vitest-dev-vitest-gmzfxl
      Browser runner started at http://localhost:5173/

 · src/index.test.js (1)
   · config needs to be object

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Unhandled Errors ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

Vitest caught 1 unhandled error during the test run.
This might cause false positive tests. Resolve unhandled errors to make sure your tests are not affected.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Unhandled Rejection ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
TypeError: process.memoryUsage is not a function
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

 Test Files   (1)
      Tests   (1)
     Errors  1 error
   Start at  17:34:48
   Duration  7.55s (transform 0ms, setup 0ms, collect 61ms, tests 0ms, environment 0ms, prepare 40ms)

Reproduction

https://stackblitz.com/edit/vitest-dev-vitest-gmzfxl?file=package.json

System Info

System:
    OS: Linux 6.8 Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS 24.04.1 LTS (Noble Numbat)
    CPU: (1) Intel Celeron 352
    Memory: 1.66 GB / 15.35 GB
    Container: Yes
    Shell: 5.2.21 - /bin/bash
  Binaries:
    Node: 22.8.0 - ~/.nvm/versions/node/v22.8.0/bin/node
    npm: 10.8.2 - ~/.nvm/versions/node/v22.8.0/bin/npm

Used Package Manager

npm

Validations

[X] Follow our Code of Conduct
[X] Read the Contributing Guidelines.
[X] Read the docs.
[X] Check that there isn't already an issue that reports the same bug to avoid creating a duplicate.
[X] Check that this is a concrete bug. For Q&A open a GitHub Discussion or join our Discord Chat Server.
[X] The provided reproduction is a minimal reproducible example of the bug.

Sep 13 '24 20:09 ghost

When I erase the line "logHeapUsage": true, in configVitest.json, at least one of the error messages disappear. But I wanted to keep this line in place.

Sep 13 '24 20:09 ghost

I'm not sure if logHeapUsage can be supported for browser mode since it's relying on Node's process.memoryUsage. At least we could prevent the runtime error if we guarded this by typeof process.memoryUsage === 'function':

https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/blob/318747da56911c6d47911bc26ee7baa3930d0eb5/packages/vitest/src/runtime/runners/test.ts#L80-L82

The error Error: CDP is not supported by the provider "preview" is probably only on stackblitz? It forces preview provider, but this happens after @vitest/coverage-v8 config checks, so it misses validations:

https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/blob/16aa76c261c1559e88cb6a39b71923d0638750c1/packages/vitest/src/node/config/resolveConfig.ts#L225-L235

https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/blob/318747da56911c6d47911bc26ee7baa3930d0eb5/packages/vitest/src/node/config/resolveConfig.ts#L769-L771

Sep 14 '24 06:09 hi-ogawa

Maybe Performance.measureUserAgentSpecificMemory() is equivalent to Node.js's process.memoryUsage because it estimates the memory used by the iframes and workers of a web page?

async function getMemoryUsage() {
  if (typeof performance !== 'undefined' && 'measureUserAgentSpecificMemory' in performance) {
    try {
      const memorySample = await performance.measureUserAgentSpecificMemory();
      return memorySample.bytes;
    } catch (error) {
      console.error('Error measuring memory:', error);
      return null;
    }
  } else {
    console.warn('Performance.measureUserAgentSpecificMemory is not supported in this browser.');
    return null;
  }
}

if (this.config.logHeapUsage) {
  getMemoryUsage().then(heapUsed => {
    if (heapUsed !== null) {
      test.result!.heap = heapUsed;
      console.log('Heap Usage:', heapUsed);
    }
  });
}

Sep 14 '24 11:09 ghost

vitest vitest copied to clipboard

UnhandledRejection: process.memoryUsage

Describe the bug

Reproduction

System Info

Used Package Manager

Validations

vitest
vitest copied to clipboard