libdsm
libdsm copied to clipboard
Merge from Artem's fork
This needs reviewing :)
Well, in fact, most of it is not good. But there are a couple of things to cherry-pick.
@elthariel no, most of the branch is very bad. There is an interesting patch about move(), but the rest is almost all useless...
There's also the asn1 thread safety part which is good
and the logoff
@elthariel then we should cherry-pick those :)
Yeah. I started to have a look by but that won't be easy
On Mon, May 8, 2017, 17:41 Jean-Baptiste Kempf [email protected] wrote:
@elthariel https://github.com/elthariel then we should cherry-pick those :)
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/videolabs/libdsm/pull/105#issuecomment-299904782, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJa866DdOKNBtDl4jlTmKawE8xbPmEfks5r3zfEgaJpZM4MVSR0 .
@Kxuan do you now what we must cherry-pick?
@jbkempf acturally, I dont known.. There are too many commits that I do not need. I just merge the 40c2404 to my fork...
@Kxuan what is there in your fork? Just 40c2404 ?
Yes. Only 4e226691e7359d798415dc09c7c901d9370ed666 is picked
4e22669 has been merged