Sameer Deshmukh
Sameer Deshmukh
Sure. Let us know if you run into difficulties.
This can be separated into two issues: 1. `DataFrame` cannot use the `name` value since it is an internal usage parameter. 2. `add_vector` should have an option for not specifying...
Pandas allows repeating values in index. However, since we haven't come across a concrete use case where this functionality is useful, I think there is no need to spend effort...
Lokesh has a point. However lets put off the uniqueness issue until someone comes up with a concrete use case.
I don't understand what you mean exactly. Can you show us an example?
I'm editing the issue comment to make an itemized list of issue items that can be tackled by a group of volunteers.
I think @lokeshh can answer this best.
If you're using integer index only why not use only `#at`? However, I like this proposition. The `#[]` method can raise an error if the *index value* is not found,...
Alright then. Marking this as an enhancement.
@lokeshh Yeah works for me. I think we should. Will remove confusion once and for all.