utterance
Anonymous comments - [Feature request]
Is it possible to add anonymous comments functionality? My idea was to create some device in the application to add an account on github already created just to make anonymous comments.
This would also work for readers who do not have a github account. So, the frontend application would have a field for name, one for email and one for comment, so, when clicking on comment, this anonymous account would write in the body of the issue comment the name, email and respective comment.
One issue I consider is the security of the password for this anonymous account. So, I think I would solve this problem by creating a Personal Access Token with minimal permissions, like commenting on issues.
What do you think?
I think it's a great idea , but there is an issue about that. May be I will fork and do some change. I got and idea from other repo which is shown below
I have seen an update based on this idea used in gitalk . The repo that implement the idea is gitalk-new His method is that saving accessToken in the file ，when visitor who want to comment , it will send the comment to the designated servers, let server to finish the comment's creation , and return to the front 。Here is how it can be done
Create a new github account for anonymous comments
get Personal access token
Account–>Settings–>Developer settings–>Personal access tokens–>Generate new token
Your must select the repo and user options in Scope. the app finally get the access token，and we will save it in the server。
Post Message for anonymous comments
when you set the anonymous_api，if user click on the button for anonymous comment , it will send a post request to anonymous_api
Url: anonymous_api
Method: POST
Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded // prevent the preflight request because of the cross site
Body: postUrl=issueUrl&content=comment
Authentication Request message
when people click to sign in , it will switch to this website
http://oauthapi.com?origin=window.location.href
if it is succesfully authenticated it will return to the blog page with the perameter access_token which will be stored in localStorage and immediately delete it in the url
this is how it work in gitalk-new. May it help the build of utterances
Both the user logged into github and anonymous (through a bot) manage to open issues, so there is the problem of spam (as reported here) in both cases.
To solve this, a possible solution to alleviate and let the task be automated is to create a workflow (github actions) so that it will look for specific keywords in the comment and will mark (or even remove it) automatically. This workflow would be triggered every time a comment appears in the repository (issue.comment).
Another solution would be to pass a github user and a PAT (Personal Access Token) in the frontend to the bot to comment anonymously using an account created by the user. This would reduce the liability issue of the official utterance bot.
Another solution to reduce the chances of the bot creating messages without moderation would be like this: every time the reader wanted to comment anonymously, by checking in a checkbox or simply clicking on a "send anonymously" button, the utterance bot would create a comment as encrypted text followed by a tag, then a workflow that would be looking at new issues would trigger in the repository, which would look for the tag and decrypt the text at runtime. Then, the workflow would use a PAT of a user configured in the repository and create a comment (then enter the aforementioned spam analysis) based on the encrypted text and remove the official comment from the bot. Encrypted text would reduce the risk of the bot being reported as abuse, even if the user did not create the workflow file.
To prevent a user from making multiple comments (flood), something some catpcha + IP/cokie session based timer per post would reduce the effect of this problem.
I'm trying my hardest to think of something to stick to existing levels of infrastructure, trying to take advantage of the utterance service itself.
Using another backend server (as here) for this would be out of scope, after all, if I have a server available, better use https://commento.io, no?
@dingiso I found the repository of the backend code of the user you quoted. https://github.com/xingty/gitalk-anonmously-comment