CLDR-16292 Update supplemental/ordinals.xml for Spanish ordinal numbers of ~1 and ~3

[gosplit]

Spanish ordinal numbers First and Third will drop o in masculine adjective forms. e.g., 1st day, 2nd day, 3rd day, 4th day, 5th day (English)= 1ᵉʳ día, 2º día, 3ᵉʳ día, 4º día, 5º día (Spanish)

The supplemental/ordinals.xml should be updated accordingly.

Reference 1: CLDR rbnf of es: https://github.com/unicode-org/cldr/blob/835e0c982ed37f994c6363909d958e1731693c03/common/rbnf/es.xml#L289-L297

Reference 2: https://www.spanish.academy/blog/ordinal-numbers/

CLDR-16292

• [x] This PR completes the ticket.

ALLOW_MANY_COMMITS=true

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[jira-pull-request-webhook[bot]]

Hooray! The files in the branch are the same across the force-push. 😃

~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot

[jira-pull-request-webhook[bot]]

Hooray! The files in the branch are the same across the force-push. 😃

~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot

[jira-pull-request-webhook[bot]]

Notice: the branch changed across the force-push!

• common/rbnf/es_419.xml is now changed in the branch
• common/rbnf/es.xml is now changed in the branch
• common/supplemental/ordinals.xml is different

View Diff Across Force-Push

~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot

[jira-pull-request-webhook[bot]]

Hooray! The files in the branch are the same across the force-push. 😃

~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot

[grhoten]

So if you're trying to fix the RBNF ordinal digit rules in this pull request, then you'll need to use the ordinal rule syntax, just like the English rules.

diff --git a/common/rbnf/es.xml b/common/rbnf/es.xml
index 2ce8d8d3ab..c995eda2bf 100644
--- a/common/rbnf/es.xml
+++ b/common/rbnf/es.xml
@@ -286,18 +286,9 @@ For terms of use, see http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html
             </ruleset>
         </rulesetGrouping>
         <rulesetGrouping type="OrdinalRules">
-            <ruleset type="dord-mascabbrev" access="private">
-                <rbnfrule value="0">º;</rbnfrule>
-                <rbnfrule value="1">ᵉʳ;</rbnfrule>
-                <rbnfrule value="2">º;</rbnfrule>
-                <rbnfrule value="3">ᵉʳ;</rbnfrule>
-                <rbnfrule value="4">º;</rbnfrule>
-                <rbnfrule value="20">→→;</rbnfrule>
-                <rbnfrule value="100">→→;</rbnfrule>
-            </ruleset>
             <ruleset type="digits-ordinal-masculine-adjective">
                 <rbnfrule value="-x">−→→;</rbnfrule>
-                <rbnfrule value="0">=#,##0=.=%%dord-mascabbrev=;</rbnfrule>
+                <rbnfrule value="0">=#,##0=.$(ordinal,one{ᵉʳ}other{º})$;</rbnfrule>
             </ruleset>
             <ruleset type="digits-ordinal-masculine">
                 <rbnfrule value="-x">−→→;</rbnfrule>
diff --git a/common/rbnf/es_419.xml b/common/rbnf/es_419.xml
index f0d135ded7..442667c32d 100644
--- a/common/rbnf/es_419.xml
+++ b/common/rbnf/es_419.xml
@@ -13,18 +13,9 @@ For terms of use, see http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html
     </identity>
     <rbnf>
         <rulesetGrouping type="OrdinalRules">
-            <ruleset type="dord-mascabbrev" access="private">
-                <rbnfrule value="0">º;</rbnfrule>
-                <rbnfrule value="1">ᵉʳ;</rbnfrule>
-                <rbnfrule value="2">º;</rbnfrule>
-                <rbnfrule value="3">ᵉʳ;</rbnfrule>
-                <rbnfrule value="4">º;</rbnfrule>
-                <rbnfrule value="20">→→;</rbnfrule>
-                <rbnfrule value="100">→→;</rbnfrule>
-            </ruleset>
             <ruleset type="digits-ordinal-masculine-adjective">
                 <rbnfrule value="-x">−→→;</rbnfrule>
-                <rbnfrule value="0">=#,##0==%%dord-mascabbrev=.;</rbnfrule>
+                <rbnfrule value="0">=#,##0=$(ordinal,one{ᵉʳ}other{º})$.;</rbnfrule>
             </ruleset>
             <ruleset type="digits-ordinal-masculine">
                 <rbnfrule value="-x">−→→;</rbnfrule>

[grhoten]

FYI the current RBNF rules don't work correctly. It's kind of hacked together. You can see the parsing issue in the Number Format Tester in a big red warning. This syntax with the revised rules will resolve that issue.