Thomas Segismont

Results 526 comments of Thomas Segismont

@geoand @FroMage it doesn't look good to me. Where are the underlying `ByteBuf` allocated? In Vert.x we use pooled direct buffers only when they do not escape to user code....

@geoand what happens if the developer uses the REST Client for something else than SSE? Is the direct buffer released somewhere?

> But really, the Vert.x docs could say what handlers should do with buffers they receive. See comment above, the docs don't say anything because Vert.x does not provide users...

cc @franz1981 (in case you got time to review this short PR)

cc @franz1981 (I think you've reviewed my working branch already but here's the proposed change to Vert.x 4.3)

Thanks for the report. Yes please go ahead! The same strategy as for server sounds good to me. Le mer. 21 sept. 2022 à 15:12, Jörg Eichhorn ***@***.***> a écrit...

This might be related to pipelining (https://github.com/eclipse-vertx/vertx-sql-client/pull/1168). I am trying to reproduce atm

I was able to reproduce. I captured network traffic and, indeed, pipelining seems involved: - with Quarkus 2.12.2, the client sends execute and close packets immediately after prepare response packet...