triallax

Quoting @SamantazFox from #789: > If anyone plan to work on that, it'd be preferrable to wait that we start working on an API v2 (or at least a remaster...

@trollogyadherent that's a separate request; this issue asks for fetching YouTube information from Invidious, not for sharing Invidious links. You're looking for https://github.com/TeamNewPipe/NewPipe/issues/2351.

I am not sure how much this would alleviate the size concern, but patching youtube-dl to remove all services/functionality not used in NewPipe should be at least somewhat helpful in...

However, I definitely think that this SHOULD be optional. You say that a size of ~153 MB is not outlandish, but I strongly disagree with that statement.

Why would we want ALL the extractors to be available? I believe there are thousands of them (if not, well, a lot), and I doubt that we're going to be...

If they indeed don't take up that much size, then yes, that makes sense.

Can you link to the site?

Service requests go in https://github.com/TeamNewPipe/NewPipeExtractor.

Sorry if I wasn't clear enough. What I'm saying is that issues that request adding new services should be opened in https://github.com/TeamNewPipe/NewPipeExtractor, not here.

I guess that would work, but then we would need to sync the two versions together, right? Another option is to share the same contributing guidelines, but note when guidelines...