trapexit

Also... while I can (and just did) statically compile mergerfs you'll still need the fuse tooling which I'm not sure is available on those OSes. Will need to check. That...

Just mount.fuse I think. I can look into creating a simple docker image if that helps. Might be worth writing up a howto to show how it can be done.

> it just seemed weird to run mergerfs inside a container Remember... mergerfs is a userspace application.

>defaults,allow_other,use_ino,func.getattr=newest,fsname=mergerFS You are using the default policy `epmfs` and default minfreespace of 4G. mergerfs doesn't aggregate storage in a linear fashion. It aggregates access to existing filesystems. The policy you...

The policies work *exactly* as described. If you put the relative path on all the drives it will just act like mfs. If you want to kinda keep stuff together...

What's the issue precisely? I don't want people concerning themselves about versions as I want them to use the latest always. The mentioning of those options at all is just...

They haven't disappeared. They are just deprecated. I couldn't remove them without breaking most of the existing installs. In retrospect calling them deprecated is pointless due to that fact. I'm...

I don't understand what you're reporting / asking.

Use backups? Use snapraid? Don't use mergerfs? Use RAID5 or 6? mergerfs doesnt provide redundancy. The whole point of the software is to combine entirely separate filesystems. With that comes...

It's not that simple. mounts can disappear at any time so it would have to actively monitor the branch to see if it changes. And it isn't free to monitor...