Tom Van Mele
Tom Van Mele
@Licini there are indeed more things that have to be added to the tolerance object but perhaps we can already merge the switch to the singleton?
i am not sure i understand your point. would you not have to do a conversion anyway in the outside environment, especially if indeed the bulk of your computation is...
since most of your computation is done in COMPAS anyway, why do you not just use the RPC functionality of COMPAS itself (https://compas.dev/compas/latest/userguide/advanced.rpc.html) instead of Hops? i am not questioning...
as said, unfortunately we can't drop support for IronPython in COMPAS 2. a CPython-only version is planned for COMPAS 3, but the development for this version will only start close...
you can ignore this for now at least. already fails when `box.frame.point` is changed directly...
not sure i understand what is being proposed. the current installation mechanism is not wrong. in Rhino 8, COMPAS packages should indeed be installed in the site packages folder of...
can we either close this issue or add an update about the current status? based on some of the questions i have been receiving it is a source of confusion...
not sure if they are helpful, but here are a few thoughts... ### Rhino CPython (py39) Basic users should use the default installation mechanism provided by Rhino, using `# r:...
it sounds like `AppData\Roaming\Grasshopper\UserObjects` is more or less the equivalent of the scripts folder. can we not install directly into `AppData\Roaming\McNeel\Rhinoceros\packages\7.0`? that way 7.0 and 8.0 are cleanly separated, which...