Thomas Ashhurst

Results 48 comments of Thomas Ashhurst

@emmanuelaaaaa that tmp folder thing is a subtle trap, so well done for noticing it! Always worth checking to see if it's still there, which might happen if CytoNorm gets...

@SansMorel I came up with the same error. After pulling the function apart, the first problem comes up in this part of `testCV`, at the end of the function: `res

So yes, it carries the `cluster_values` value the whole way through to that point. If you change it fro `c(5, 10, 15)` to `c(5, 10)` then it works fine.

@emmanuelaaaaa @emrizzi @SofieVG this is interesting. @ghar1821 and I have occasionally found the odd couple of cells that have been given extremely high values (or extremely high negative values) after...

@vivek-verma202 it doesn't have to, but it's a bit complicated. In our implementation in [Spectre](https://sydneycytometry.org.au/spectre) we generate clusters using only stable markers to get the major population groups (e.g. Ly6G,...

@EAC-T you can also try using fewer metacluster to try and generate a slightly more accurate model -- this can often help prevent those extremely high values appearing the resulting...

Ah apologies that’s our fault, will update it shortly — but here is the actual link: https://unisyd-my.sharepoint.com/personal/thomas_ashhurst_sydney_edu_au/_layouts/15/onedrive.aspx?id=%2Fpersonal%2Fthomas%5Fashhurst%5Fsydney%5Fedu%5Fau%2FDocuments%2FShared%2FSpectre%20PDFs%2FDiscovery%20workflow%20with%20batch%20alignment%20using%20CytoNorm%2Dv19%2D20240415%5F044409%2Epdf&parent=%2Fpersonal%2Fthomas%5Fashhurst%5Fsydney%5Fedu%5Fau%2FDocuments%2FShared%2FSpectre%20PDFs&ga=1 Tom ________________________________ From: Marie Crane ***@***.***> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2024 16:13 To:...

Hmm that's very odd -- I can see it OK even if not signed in, maybe I've broken something. If you email me at [email protected] I can just send you...

@mariecrane updated page for the CytoNorm workflow here: https://immunedynamics.io/spectre/cytonorm/. Give it a try and let us know if it makes sense.

Hi @grizzly2207 , thanks for reaching out! `$PnR NA is invalid` suggests initially to me that one of the columns in `cellular.cols` might not be numeric? Could you double check?