Tõivo Leedjärv

I've prepared a debug build (without the GUI) for you. Can you grab it and give it a go? https://github.com/tleedjarv/unison/actions/runs/2676841186 (the downloads will appear once all builds have finished) It...

> is there any advantage to a specific ocaml version or should I just go for 4.14? Just go for 4.14.

The underlying cause here is that Unison does not consider times for symlinks and the reconciliation code sees times for all symlinks as 0. This has of course more side-effects...

Yes, the semantics of force/prefer newer/older could be good to define fully. Note that there is also an issue with deleted objects as it is impossible to retrieve the deletion...

Option 2 above could be made to operate in a more constrained and better defined case by changing all the patterns in their respective forms from ``` ocaml `Created, _...

Yes, none of the proposed options here break the protocol.

I have two proposals for you. First is to use the `UNISON` env variable to use a different homedir. This can easily be done in the `Makefile`. But this still...

I'm slowly investigating memory consumption issues. I'm still very early in the process but I thought I'd share an update on the progress. I don't know OCaml or its GC...

As I've learned more about the code I now have a better understanding of what is going on. Actual memory leaks are very few or none (mostly in form of...

> I'm a bit skeptical whether I would like renames to be displayed during reconciliation. As you mentioned, with a delete and a create entry, the user can choose to...