Tim Chambers

Thanks for the vote of confidence. I have a lot of these where I "know" I need to be non-greedy. So this will ensure I have the proper test cases.

@mbj Is that a philosophical question? I need to test to avoid greedyness - I have multiple pairs of "bookends" in a string. SO this mutation would prove I have...

@mbj actually I think this may work potentially as a mutation both ways. I may have some places where greedyness is warranted, and I have used non-greedy test data without...

It may be painful to a degree, but the value is worth the pain at this point. Thanks for being cognizant of it. It would be nice to have an...

Once things are machine readable, then putting a straightforward UI on it seems like a smaller step. Again - appreciate your recognition. I still rank adding valuable mutations over adding...

@backus - on the advice of @mbj I eliminated all `module_function` references and was more specific. So I don't have any specs that require me to handle this issue. If...

My recall is I dropped the `module_function` and prefixed the method defs with `self.`

@dkubb Sounds clearer to me that my term. @mbj Orthogonal is good too. I guess my question is really - is there a reason to NOT perform these orthogonal mutations?

The ability to classify the mutations for me helped me envision additional ones. SO I felt more _engaged_ in the process of considering what makes a valuable mutation, as opposed...

I would add that classifying the mutations allowed me to develop mitigation strategies in my code. It helped me develop a mental _cheat sheet_ of how to code to kill...