Elmer Thomas

Hello @assertnotnull, Great catch! When using [dynamic transactional templates](https://sendgrid.com/solutions/email-api/dynamic-email-templates/), we don't need to set the content values. I believe the change will need to be implemented [here](https://github.com/sendgrid/sendgrid-nodejs/blob/d4ca1c2b0be3aeed9ee0795cda90065aa04f3119/packages/helpers/classes/mail.d.ts#L160). This issue has...

Hello @hyperpress, The officially supported usage is documented [here](https://github.com/sendgrid/sendgrid-nodejs/tree/master/packages/mail). I've added your request to our backlog for further investigation. If you have any other information that could help us add...

Hello @malimccalla, We will route this request to the proper location internally on your behalf and update you here on any progress. Thank you! With best regards, Elmer

Internal tracking#: CL-2681

Hello @aimythgit, I believe you should use `sgClient1.send(msg)` as demonstrated [here](https://github.com/sendgrid/sendgrid-nodejs/tree/main/packages/mail#quick-start-hello-email). [This package](https://github.com/sendgrid/sendgrid-nodejs/tree/main/packages/mail) is the closest thing we have to an email only helper library. With best regards, Elmer

Hello @machinshin, Thanks for taking the time to report this. I have added this to our backlog for further investigation.

Hi @ZeroCho, We do have a package [here](https://github.com/sendgrid/sendgrid-nodejs/tree/master/packages/inbound-mail-parser), but unfortunately there is no good usage documentation. For that, you might want to check out the [Python Inbound Parser](https://github.com/sendgrid/sendgrid-python/tree/master/sendgrid/helpers/inbound). With Best...

Hello @bogdan, Thanks for taking the time to report this! I'm re-classifying this to a feature request since the current behavior is not broken, but it could be optimized. This...

Hello @dungahk, It looks like there is a bug in the `AttachmentData` interface. I will add this issue to our backlog for a fix as well as tag it for...

Hello @dungahk, @sculaste, Have you tried using `content_id` instead of `contentId` as the key? With Best Regards, Elmer