pipeline
pipeline copied to clipboard
Disable Matrix Validation for non Matrix Pipelines
This disables the Matrix Validation for Results in non Matrixed Pipelines. This ensures that the controller doesn't encounter any crash or such for these pipelines as it did at issue https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/issues/8086
Fixes #8086
Changes
Submitter Checklist
As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:
- [ ] Has Docs if any changes are user facing, including updates to minimum requirements e.g. Kubernetes version bumps
- [ ] Has Tests included if any functionality added or changed
- [ ] pre-commit Passed
- [x] Follows the commit message standard
- [ ] Meets the Tekton contributor standards (including functionality, content, code)
- [ ] Has a kind label. You can add one by adding a comment on this PR that contains
/kind <type>. Valid types are bug, cleanup, design, documentation, feature, flake, misc, question, tep - [ ] Release notes block below has been updated with any user facing changes (API changes, bug fixes, changes requiring upgrade notices or deprecation warnings). See some examples of good release notes.
- [ ] Release notes contains the string "action required" if the change requires additional action from users switching to the new release
Release Notes
NONE
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df to re-run this coverage report
| File | Old Coverage | New Coverage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| pkg/apis/pipeline/v1/pipeline_validation.go | 99.2% | 91.7% | -7.5 |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report
| File | Old Coverage | New Coverage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| pkg/apis/pipeline/v1/pipeline_validation.go | 99.2% | 91.7% | -7.5 |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df to re-run this coverage report
| File | Old Coverage | New Coverage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| pkg/apis/pipeline/v1/pipeline_validation.go | 99.2% | 92.2% | -7.1 |
/retest
Are tests failing due to WIP?
/retest
@vdemeester Sure. I am adding that.
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df to re-run this coverage report
| File | Old Coverage | New Coverage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| pkg/apis/pipeline/v1/pipeline_validation.go | 99.2% | 99.0% | -0.2 |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report
| File | Old Coverage | New Coverage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| pkg/apis/pipeline/v1/pipeline_validation.go | 99.2% | 99.0% | -0.2 |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please assign jeromeju after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @jeromeju in a comment when ready.
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df to re-run this coverage report
| File | Old Coverage | New Coverage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| pkg/apis/pipeline/v1/pipeline_validation.go | 99.2% | 99.0% | -0.2 |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report
| File | Old Coverage | New Coverage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| pkg/apis/pipeline/v1/pipeline_validation.go | 99.2% | 99.0% | -0.2 |
@vdemeester I have added one regression test.
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df to re-run this coverage report
| File | Old Coverage | New Coverage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| pkg/apis/pipeline/v1/pipeline_validation.go | 99.2% | 99.0% | -0.2 |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report
| File | Old Coverage | New Coverage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| pkg/apis/pipeline/v1/pipeline_validation.go | 99.2% | 99.0% | -0.2 |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df to re-run this coverage report
| File | Old Coverage | New Coverage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| pkg/apis/pipeline/v1/pipeline_validation.go | 99.2% | 99.0% | -0.2 |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report
| File | Old Coverage | New Coverage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| pkg/apis/pipeline/v1/pipeline_validation.go | 99.2% | 99.2% | 0.0 |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df to re-run this coverage report
| File | Old Coverage | New Coverage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| pkg/apis/pipeline/v1/pipeline_validation.go | 99.2% | 99.2% | 0.0 |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df to re-run this coverage report
| File | Old Coverage | New Coverage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| pkg/apis/pipeline/v1/pipeline_validation.go | 99.2% | 99.0% | -0.2 |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df to re-run this coverage report
| File | Old Coverage | New Coverage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| pkg/apis/pipeline/v1/pipeline_validation.go | 99.2% | 99.0% | -0.2 |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage-df to re-run this coverage report
| File | Old Coverage | New Coverage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| pkg/apis/pipeline/v1/pipeline_validation.go | 99.2% | 99.2% | 0.0 |
@vdemeester Examples aren't run as upgrade tests. We need a more complex pipeline for upgrade tests.
#8086 is marked as closed by #8089, but this is meant to fix the same issue. Do we need to reopen #8086, was the fix incomplete?
@afrittoli I would say it's a partial fix. Error can happen in some other flow also.
@vdemeester Examples aren't run as upgrade tests. We need a more complex pipeline for upgrade tests.
I think @vdemeester question was about why did you modify the upgrade test instead of the regular integration test.
Hi @khrm, thank you for your work on this, will you be continuing work on this ?
I think we can close this for now. There was another pr which solve this.
Oh. As I said, we fixed one flow, but error can happen in this flow also. I needed to change test for this. Let me check.
@khrm this needs a rebase 👼🏼