proposal-extensions
proposal-extensions copied to clipboard
Rename the proposal from "extensions" to "static dispatch operator"
Currently the proposal is named as "Extensions and :: operator". I'm considering rename it to "static dispatch operator" (contrasts with . and [], which are dynamic dispatch operators).
Though extension methods/accessors are the important motivation/use cases of the proposal, there are also other motivation/use cases. For example utilize :: operator to get good syntax for first-class protocol and static invoking in the classes.
Another issue is not every people know extensions concept well, and it also has different with extensions of other programming languages (use :: operator instead of . operator, has receiver::X:foo form).
So renaming the proposal to "static dispatch operator" could give the more precise description --- provide a form of method dispatch which resolve the method/function statically, contrasts with a.foo and a["foo"] which resolve the method/function dynamically.
As such renaming, Symbol.extension will also be renamed to Symbol.dispatcher.