Tim Bates
Hi @mhunter1 is there a test model? then i can check easily? Pretty sure umx will just be passing through the obtained values, and it's fairly bullet proof about getting...
how should we divide this up/get this done?
I removed all the uses of algebras for group objectives I could see
Fixed most of the free=T instead of TRUE (but not all the uses in big matrix blocks that would get messy... TBD. Replaced direct access to model$output$fit and model$output$estimate with...
I guess it's been conventional for the row element of the dim names list to be NULL, so they don't get checked. ```R mxMatrix("Full",1, 3, free = TRUE, dimnames =...
Here's an example. It appears to work: The means fix fixed the algebra double naming also... But exposes an issue where other functions (at least `mxStandardizeRAMpaths` don't work (see below)....
I guess we should print `"polite note: parallel is not yet implemented"` I'll update the Rd to say not parallel not working and note that algebras are not booted.
Updated Rd to note that `parallel` is (currently) ignored. I tested our boot speed as-is/1-core: We show a 5.7x speed-up compared to `lavaan(..., se = "bootstrap")`, and it is linear...
All links are now fixed (thanks @RMKirkpatrick !) The following sections have no link to an example script or help page... 1. Missing Data 2. Categorical Threshold Estimation -- Models...