docs(features): update `upload.mdx`

[dreyfus92]

What kind of changes does this PR include?

• New or updated content

Description

• Closes #1494
• What does this PR change? Give us a brief description. Updates /features/upload page

[!NOTE] WIP Still checking details of the plugin.

[netlify[bot]]

✅ Deploy Preview for tauri-docs-starlight ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	6753978304455e765c0369f09f0a884066666998
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/tauri-docs-starlight/deploys/65f5ca9b904ddf000831c1ac
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1924--tauri-docs-starlight.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse	1 paths audited Performance: 100 (no change from production) Accessibility: 100 (no change from production) Best Practices: 100 (no change from production) SEO: 92 (no change from production) PWA: - View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[FabianLars]

ah damn, that's my bad. @amrbashir We still want to merge it into the http plugin right?

[amrbashir]

I think it is fine to keep as is (or removed) since a combination of http + fs plugins can achieve the same thing?

I am a bit hesitated to merge into http plugin because we will need to handle scope for the filesystem as well and also upload plugin have a bit more dependencies that may not concern most users using http plugin.

[FabianLars]

a combination of http + fs plugins can achieve the same thing?

That'd be much slower because the data would have to go through the ipc. The v2 ipc may be faster, but not that much faster :/

also upload plugin have a bit more dependencies that may not concern most users using http plugin.

imo feature flags would be fine for that 🤷

because we will need to handle scope for the filesystem as well

Hmm, that's indeed annoying and a good reason...

[amrbashir]

I guess better to be kept as a standalone plugin

[FabianLars]

should we rename it to http-extra? 😂 (not actually meant as a joke, i don't like the upload name when it can download too)

[amrbashir]

sure, whatever sounds right with you

[dreyfus92]

@FabianLars, so should I close this?

[FabianLars]

No, seems like we keep the plugin. If we indeed rename it then we can just change the docs 🤷