stanford_alpaca
stanford_alpaca copied to clipboard
tatsu-lab
License question
Hello. LLAMA is custom-licensed product of meta, which distributed only for research purposes. Alpaca based on llama. Does it means that using of alpaca in commercial products is illegal?
No, afaik all derivates from LLAMA have to use a non-commercial license too.
From our Overlord Bing: According to a Stanford announcement, Alpaca is intended only for academic research and any commercial use is prohibited. This decision is based on three factors: First, Alpaca is based on LLaMA, which has a non-commercial license, so they necessarily inherit this decision1.
No, afaik all derivates from LLAMA have to use a non-commercial license too.
So its like GPL or I can not install even unmodified alpaka in my commercial project?
This repo is tagged as [Apache-2.0 license] (https://github.com/tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca/blob/main/LICENSE)
From our Overlord Bing: According to a Stanford announcement, Alpaca is intended only for academic research and any commercial use is prohibited. This decision is based on three factors: First, Alpaca is based on LLaMA, which has a non-commercial license, so they necessarily inherit this decision1.
the license page shows Apache 2.0, which is a license allowing for commercial use: https://github.com/tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca/blob/main/LICENSE I think it's a mistake and they should change it.
