tailscale-qpkg
tailscale-qpkg copied to clipboard
Another installation source for qnap users
Since the qnap app store is slow to review updates, I'm wondering if there are more ways to provide qpkg package
- Maintain a third-party application repository on pkgs.tailscale.com/stable/#qpkgs
- Collaboration with existing reputable third-party repository(
myqnap.orghas maintained a third-party branch )
I think the existing manual update method needs to be improved
- github release is out of sync with the
pkgs.tailscale.comrelease - People are confused which variants to choose #88 #119 #122
- Updating the application by manually uploading QPKG package is very inefficient.
Happy to find these are now up to date at https://pkgs.tailscale.com/stable/#qpkgs
@delaveganz any idea if those new packages auto-update?
I don't think they do. But @awly would know.
QNAP clients know how to auto-update, but only using the QNAP app store.
IMO, our options to improve QNAP updates, in decreasing order of preference, are:
- work with QNAP to let us update more often (unlikely, but we should try)
- set up a 3rd-party QNAP app repository on pkgs.tailscale.com, but only if we can preserve signature validation in the app store (these instructions require disabling signature validation entirely)
- reimplement auto-update /
tailscale updatesupport for QNAP to fetch our packages from pkgs.tailscale.com and install them on top of the app store version
In the meantime, this pkgs.tailscale.com/stable/#qpkgs source for tailscale qnap releases should be written in the readme - I did not know about it until digging through for the most up-to-date qpkg, since github releases are outdated.
Happy to find these are now up to date at https://pkgs.tailscale.com/stable/#qpkgs
Too bad this is not the case anymore... https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale-qpkg/issues/144
As it seems QNAP is very slow updating the packages in store it'd be great if third party repo was established to streamline the process.