Sidney Glinton
Sidney Glinton
@rareddy it is. That's what Debarati is asking for that to be exposed to the client lib for testing.
> I think we need confirmation from @dbasunag and others we're not going to remove the MR py client user method testing. Yes from my talk from @dbasunag we are...
We might not need to expose the client, We might be able to just use/do this: ``` mr = ModelRegistry(...) raw_client_fnc = mr._api.get_client async with raw_client_fnc() as raw_client: raw_client.create_registered_model(...) #
I believe we can close this out :) @tarilabs @dbasunag
To start, suggestion to eventually modularize the client code more and split out larger files. https://github.com/kubeflow/model-registry/pull/1111#issuecomment-2883991681
@tarilabs yes we can do that. We can address in a cleanup for it at a later date?
I believe we should move `as_mlops_engineer_i_` itests the Python client tests and move them to a dedicated file to de-clutter the tests. re: https://github.com/kubeflow/model-registry/blob/a56dc202495c6a04d3ab90243befecf072cf29f3/clients/python/tests/test_client.py#L1181 and re: https://github.com/kubeflow/model-registry/blob/a56dc202495c6a04d3ab90243befecf072cf29f3/clients/python/tests/regression_test.py#L140 please note they...
What case was this an issue?
@xyk2000 Please see my issue https://github.com/ranaroussi/quantstats/issues/430 for interests in maintaining this project further.
https://github.com/syntaxsdev/quantstats-community/pull/2