stuartmorgan-g

> @stuartmorgan this is ready for review. We inspected the logs for the failing web platform tests and it seems to be reporting based on Android? This is because there...

@ditman Looks like the original never got your review for web; if you could take a look here when you get a chance that would be great.

> I've finished reviewing the platform interface, and since the overall structure was already reviewed in the previous PR you are good to split that out into the first prequel...

> However, a few discussions remain open, and I'm actively seeking further input on those. Was there anything other than web-specific questions? I looked back through the comments and didn't...

@cyanglaz, @ditman, @reidbaker: ping on the platform portions of this review.

@PROGrand Are you still planning on following up on this PR (in particular, all the CI failures)?

I've closed the draft PR (which was blocking re-opening this one) in favor of this one.

It looks this this still needs: - initial review of Windows from @cbracken - re-review of Android by @camsim99 - a response from @PROGrand to the review comment from @ditman...

That's already in progress; https://github.com/flutter/packages/pull/3615 was created before this was fully reviewed.

@PROGrand is this PR still something you are planning on moving forward with?