Steve Lawrence

FYI, this PR had some merge conflicts due to the mavenization of the repo. I rebased onto the latest main branch with no changes needed and force pushed to resolve...

FYI, this PR was quite a bit behind main so I rebased it onto the latest master.

> Some runs printed their error messages in foreign languages (I wonder how that happened?) For a while we had a few tests that expected error messages that were generated...

With the changes to scalaxb, is this ready for re-review?

Can you please rebase to the latest main branch and resolve the conflicts?

> @stevedlawrence I know there was a discuss out for releasing Daffodil 3.7.0. Would this possibly be a PR we could get in before the actual release or where do...

Does Daffodil ever really need the CRL -> LF canonicalization? If CR is part of an actual field and is not used as a delimiter or something, it seems we...

> The default scheme needs to be exactly what we do today. I thought mapping CR to LF was a regression that should be fixed? Or have we always done...

> > I thought mapping CR to LF was a regression that should be fixed? Or have we always done this mapping? > > Actually, I am not sure about...