Stevan Little

I can appreciate that.

Yes, this makes sense, however we need to be careful about how much work we are adding to the bootstrap, it could cause performance issues.

The behavior of the second example makes no sense at all, I think perhaps you have an old version of rakudo

``` 12:55 stevan_: hey 6ixers 12:55 stevan_: can anyone explain what is going on in the second example here: https://github.com/stevan/p5-mop-redux/issues/126 12:56 arnsholt: There won't be an accessor if you declare...

It seems we are not 100% following Perl 6, but that is because our traits are just a lot simpler then theirs.

``` 13:29 jnthn: stevan_: Just to make sure all is clear: the "is readonly" and "is rw" traits on an Attribute meta-object simply set whether the accessor will be rw...

@forwardever - the `$.foo` is really not possible since in order to keep compat with Perl 6 we would need to introduce lvalue accessors and they suck in Perl 5....

#1 - is just not going to happen, they require too much overhead in Perl 5 and have too many edge cases. #2 - would be even more confusing for...

RE: 2) if we want with `$.foo` then in order to maintain compat with Perl 6 we would need to have a default read-only accessor, currently we have no default...

re: 2) you suggested > ... to create just simple accessors $self->bar and $self->bar('foo') using $. twigil If we use the `$.foo` twigil and want to keep in line with...